IX
II
X
II:8. Apart from the advocacy of textual technologies to poetics as a continuation of its
own practices, there is a growing literature which represents hypertext in particular as the instantiation
or embodiment of modern and post-modern critical theory. [PoMo]
However,
while this literature acknowledges a quantity of previous (chiefly prose) work, especially modernist
exemplars and criticism associated with, for example, the poetics of Barthes and Tel Quel,
(to a limited extent, writers associated with) Fluxus, the OuLiPo, post-structuralist schools, etc., and
while it has engaged radical textualities in traditional delivery media (codexspace), it has
not, especially in its more polemical moments or when focused on pedagogical methodology, given the
same degree of attention to radical poetries per se for instance those of Cage, Mac
Low, L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E, and so on. Even these new critics of hypertext are occasionally
caught in the uncertainty as to whether they should promote a new projection device or continue to
develop a radical cultural critique. It is as if the real/physical/engineered/programmed
representation of post-modern critical theory tends to attract special privilege when set against its
representation as a function of, say, the writerly (scriptible) text; as a function, that is, of the
writers
proposal of new textualities and the readers disposal of interpretative, intertextual engagements.
[WRITERLY]
IX
X